3 Funds That Aim to Offer the World
This week, the world’s most powerful leaders — the Group of Eight — met in Italy to discuss how to handle the comprehensive recession. Meanwhile, oil prices plunged, ousted Honduran president Manuel Zelaya tried to regain power of his country and violent protests broke out in China.
Those events aren’t the only reasons why the international vista is getting its honest share of the focus. Indeed, just as attention-grabbing: fund performance. According to Lipper, the average domestic equity fund gained 6.5% in the first half of 2009; while the typical world equity offering gained 14.7%. Those income have convinced investors that it may be time to once again send their money to overseas markets in Europe and Asia.
Investors who managed to more than double their income by investing in an international fund instead of a domestic one were either prescient or just plain lucky. Usually, it comes down to a modest of the former and a lot of the latter. But that’s a pretty huge gamble to make. That’s why the mutual fund industry cooked up something called comprehensive funds. These offerings invest both in the U.S. and in countries further than its borders. The thought is simple: Give investors a one-stop option that buys stock tickers throughout the world’s exchanges. Investors can then sit back and relax instead of making what could turn out to be a poorly-timed investing pronouncement on, say, Japanese retailers or European banks.
Our fund screen tool lists 2,128 comprehensive/international funds. (We’ll get to the problem with the labeling of these funds in a minute.) We trimmed that group down to 274 by disqualifying funds that charge a sales load. We then looked for funds with top-tier performance track records during the trailing three- and five-year time periods. The funds also had to charge below-average fees. We were ultimately left with just three funds.
In order to arrive at that final list we had to do a modest subjective tweaking. This is where the labeling problem comes in. Tim Courtney, the chief investment officer at Oklahoma City-based Burns Advisory Group, defines comprehensive funds as those having around 40% of their assets invested in the U.S. That’s a definition that jibes with our thinking and with other experts, as well. But our fund screen tool lumps together comprehensive funds that fit our standard with international ones that could allocate much more of their money overseas. To make sure the funds fit that 40% parameter, we personally sifted through them. Anything less than 20% and greater than 50% was knocked out of contention.
Comprehensive funds offer investors an simple way to get instant selection diversification. And, for beginning investors, or those with smaller account balances, they’re also a cheaper alternative to buying several international and domestic funds. “We will use some comprehensive funds as an simple way to get access to broad diversification on smaller balances when we don’t want to go and buy several funds,” says Courtney.
Though, some advisors point to the last year and argue that investors need to be more proactive with their retirement accounts instead of relying on a manufactured goods that is wrapped up neatly for them. These advisors like to actively manage their domestic and international exposure, in order to avoid areas that may be cooling off while taking advantage of others that are heating up.
That point is illustrated in the income of comprehensive funds during the first half of 2009. The average U.S. large-cap fund returned 5.6%, according to Lipper, while the typical international large-cap fund — those that only invest further than the U.S. — gained 7.1%. Meanwhile, comprehensive large-cap funds that invest in the U.S. and abroad finished aptly in the middle of those two groups, gaining an average 6.8%. That middling performance is why some advisors prefer to pick and choose their funds.
When we arrive at a list that has such few candidates we feel compelled to give reasons for where all the competition went. Polaris Comprehensive Value (PGVFX) and T. Rowe Price Comprehensive stock ticker (PRGSX) didn’t have excellent enough performance track records at the time. Dodge & Cox Comprehensive stock ticker (DODWX) and Thornburg Comprehensive Opportunities (THOAX) haven’t reached their fifth birthdays, so they don’t have long enough histories for inclusion. (The Thornburg fund also charges a sales load.)
One that made it through, Oakmark Comprehensive (OAKGX), is a fund that has made our list before. According to Morningstar, the fund has 39% of its assets in North America, 38% in Europe and Britain and 17% in Japan, with the rest spread throughout areas like Latin America. Top holdings include Oracle (ORCL), Credit Suisse (CS), Bulgari and Intel (INTC). The fund has returned an average annual 2% the last five years, about a half percentage point ahead of a Morningstar comprehensive index.
The Criteria: The funds on this week’s list are classified as comprehensive/international by Lipper. We narrowed down our candidates by looking for those with performance track records during the trailing three- and five-year time periods that place them in the top 50% of their peer group. The funds had to be open to new investors, charge an annual expense ratio under 1.5% and require a minimum investment less than $5,000. Furthermore, the funds had to have around 40% of their assets invested in the U.S. in order to fit our definition of a comprehensive fund. As usual, we did not include load funds.
| Ticker | Fund | Assets | Year-to-Date Return (%) | 3-Year Average Annual Return (%) | 5-Year Average Annual Return (%) | Expense Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source: Lipper Note: Data as of July 9, 2009 |
||||||
| FWWFX | Fidelity Worldwide | 906 | 0.6 | -7.0 | 1.21 | 1.21 |
| OAKGX | Oakmark Comprehensive | 1384 | 6.5 | -6.8 | 2.00 | 1.16 |
| USAWX | USAA World Growth | 363 | 2.3 | -5.7 | 2.10 | 1.24 |
SMARTMONEY ® Layout and look and feel of SmartMoney.com are trademarks of SmartMoney, a joint venture linking Dow Jones & Company, Inc. and Hearst SM Relationship. © 1995 – 2009 SmartMoney. All Rights Reserved.
<img src=”http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/smartmoney/stock tickerscreen/~4/ZC1Tv4hBNA0″ height=”1″ width=”1″ />
Related posts:Funds Making Money in the World’s Riskiest Markets Rob Lutts, president of Cabot Money Management in Salem, Mass., routinely travels to Pacific...Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
-->Filed Under stock market news | Leave a Comment
Tagged With